the propaganda machine of the left have done remarkably well at demonizing any- even extremely soft- right-wing/conservative values to such an extent that......https://twitter.com/fchollet/status/1041383655443062784 …
-
-
Replying to @rivatez
I hear this a lot, but it kinda seems to come down to "is rich" & "understands how wealth works" (a terrible skill to neglect when you actually have wealth). Seems like it's less about values & more about which bucket "wealthy person" gets placed in within the ID politics frame
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @rivatez
If you remove "fiscal conservatism," which afaict used to mean "small government" & now means "any reasonable understanding of how money works," what about SV techies looks right-wing at all? It's a stretch. They're not religious. They're not having kids.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @rivatez
only dipping in to say wait lol they are *TOTALLY* religious, it's just a new religion - earth mother goddess shit, 'we are all one,' rigid creation and apocalypse myths framed with meaning (nihilistic birth, death by selfishness), hostile contempt for inconvenient science
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @micsolana @rivatez
I would totally buy that they're cognitively-determined pagans as a direct result of the same slightly wonky pattern-matching equipment that makes them good at whatever it is that keeps the lights on in San Francisco, but that's def not "right-wing" "religion"
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @micsolana
I think of ‘religion’ and ‘having kids’ as correlated by-products of right-wing values around respecting tradition, social norms & hierarchies, natural law etc. (but saying that- the religious, dynasty-building conservative faction in SV is growing too! They just aren’t tweeting)
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
I have two seemingly contradictory opinions about this (as usual): 1. If socially progressive libertarians identify as right-wing, I accept 2. If "right-wing" means everything that is *not* Marxism, I don't accept (and will scream)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
but it really matters what you mean by socially progressive. a few years ago, I would have called myself socially liberal. with current identity politics etc- I’m definitely now on the conservative end. the progressive scale has gone off the charts, beyond many people’s limits
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
That is very important indeed -- we now have so many tags that they aren't any meaningful anymore. I look at *coercion* whenever I think about being socially progressive: whoever has a normative coercive ambition is not a progressive. Have you read https://areomagazine.com/2018/08/23/no-we-are-not-right-wing-we-are-liberal-lefties-and-we-are-many/ … ?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
i loved this piece - cosign
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
