you aren't concerned, as a journalist, that three massive corporations have been granted cultural authority to police speech outside the bounds of liberalism, via the constitution? you guys criticize these companies constantly. why so quick to grant them further power?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @micsolana @jeffbercovici
the central metaphor here is also broken, man. we're not talking about removing a ukulele player from a small, independent business. we're talking about taking his ukulele and permanently banning him from the town.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jeffbercovici
assuming you are talking about private ownership (i can't read minds, and your comment here is ambiguous), they aren't different. these companies completely control the way we interact online. they effectively are the city.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jeffbercovici
so you support the regulation of these companies as a public utility? because i'm pretty sure legally, once they are, you won't be able to ban people like alex jones from speaking. at least not in america.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
at this point, i'm close to there myself.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.