you aren't concerned, as a journalist, that three massive corporations have been granted cultural authority to police speech outside the bounds of liberalism, via the constitution? you guys criticize these companies constantly. why so quick to grant them further power?
the central metaphor here is also broken, man. we're not talking about removing a ukulele player from a small, independent business. we're talking about taking his ukulele and permanently banning him from the town.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
assuming you are talking about private ownership (i can't read minds, and your comment here is ambiguous), they aren't different. these companies completely control the way we interact online. they effectively are the city.
Keskustelun loppu
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
