Conversation

Every autumn, John Doe traveled a long distance for something he claimed was important, and this aroused the curiosity of a rational choice theorist. "What do you do there?" he asked. "I dote," John replied. "I dote on Sally, my granddaughter."
1
"No, no, I mean, does your doting make it any more probable that she'll do great things than if you don't dote?" "More probable? Never thought about it. She'll do great things anyway. I like her best of all my grandchildren."
1
John's questioner became exasperated. "You spend a lot of money and effort to go and dote, without expecting your doting to make a difference?" "Should I?" "Oh, yes," said the rational choice theorist. "It's a law of human nature. Your actions are anomalous."
1
The theorist, further perplexed, wondered whether Doe had considered the possibility that he would die before the benefits of doting could be enjoyed. The rational choice theorist never solved the riddle, but he posed the issues in a famous paper entitled "The Doter's Paradox."
1