@BenHowe @AndrewKirell if you want to defend @michellemalkin answer the Q she hasn't yet. Why include illness in line of duty killings?
-
-
Replying to @edkrayewski
@edkrayewski It is impossible for me to care less about whether she has satisfactorily answered your concerns.@AndrewKirell@michellemalkin2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenHowe
@BenHowe@edkrayewski@michellemalkin Er, it’s pretty important to why I said she went on a victimized rant...7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewKirell
@BenHowe@edkrayewski@michellemalkin Because she didn’t answer him and then went on a rant about woe is me, Reason is lecturing meeeee1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewKirell
@AndrewKirell@BenHowe@michellemalkin And if you read my article, I didn't lecture her. So your response is emotional, like a leftie2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @edkrayewski
@edkrayewski Oh, I didn’t read your article. Not planning to either. Like I said, I was responding to@AndrewKirell.@michellemalkin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenHowe
@BenHowe@edkrayewski@michellemalkin lol you are such a joke.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AndrewKirell
@AndrewKirell because I thought your “victimization” tweet was stupid? Yes, I see your point.@edkrayewski@michellemalkin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenHowe
@BenHowe@AndrewKirell@michellemalkin she can do what she wants. I don't think what I gave her deserves a venting, just a few answers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @edkrayewski
@edkrayewski@BenHowe@michellemalkin Pt was that she ignored yr main pt & then ranted about how u lecture her. & we STILL have no response!7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@AndrewKirell @edkrayewski @BenHowe 2) My Twitter discourse was not just about you, as many of the ppl I was responding to are fully aware.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.