Gee, couldn't be because phony war on women or talking about V-JJs is idiocy could it. Is NYTimes kidding? @michellemalkin @Poynter
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michellemalkin@Poynter Anyway they can to demean a person because ppl look first at the outrageous & then let the truth slip by...?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kind of like
@michellemalkin trying to publicly shame@lenadunham https://twitter.com/michellemalkin/status/413837402914840576 …@PoynterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michellemalkin@Poynter Genital inequality will be the next big talking point I guess. FYI, Intellegence is not contained in these areas.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michellemalkin@Poynter Sad commentary on what discourse is all about.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@michellemalkin Serendipity. I'm doing a Twitter rant about this very subject right now.@PoynterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@michellemalkin@Poynter I've seen@charlescwcooke, ie, defend lib female writers he tweets about from a**hats. Should be our default.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.