ICYMI: The crucifixion of Jason Richwinehttp://michellemalkin.com/2013/05/09/the-crucifixion-of-jason-richwine/ …
-
-
Replying to @michellemalkin
I encourage you to read this
@michellemalkin column about Jason Richwine for balance: http://michellemalkin.com/2013/05/09/the-crucifixion-of-jason-richwine/ …0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR@michellemalkin it's interesting mostly to see the language Malkin uses to support (rather than criticize) a Harvard-trained Ph.D.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dandrezner
@dandrezner@DaveedGR Right, cuz I'm just an idiot who couldn't possibly appreciate what it takes to earn a PhD in quantitative analysis.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michellemalkin
@michellemalkin@DaveedGR you misinterpret my tweet. I'm saying if this was a left-wing Ph.D. at CAP you'd be bashing Harvard with glee.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dandrezner
@dandrezner@michellemalkin That's unfair. You should evaluate her arg based on what she wrote, not what she might do in another situation.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR@dandrezner 2 can play this game: If anyone other than me had written the piece, DD might more readily agree that it is troubling.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michellemalkin
@michellemalkin@DaveedGR But on his diss, no way you write something like this without discussing "sample bias" or "selection bias". (3/3)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@dandrezner @DaveedGR Glad to hear your acknowledgement on 2nd issue. On 1st issue, did you read Part 2 Section 2 yet? Do you plan to?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.