@michellemalkin @DavidHogberg @ProLifeStuff Only in America, would personal preferences outweigh the law of the land. Stupid IL judges.
-
-
-
@Cadrieu@michellemalkin@ProLifeStuff Um, "personal preferences" are the law of the land. That's what the 1st Amendment is about. -
@DavidHogberg Not when they are to the detriment of society as a whole. That would be gross stupidity on the part of the legislators. -
@Cadrieu And are you going to decide what is and is not to the "detriment of society as a whole"? Hard to see how 2 pharms fit that bill -
@DavidHogberg It is when what they decide can now mean that their personal belief means you don’t get the medicinal treatment you need. -
@Cadrieu But do they get to decide for the whole society? Plenty of pharmacists willing to sell those drugs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SantaCruz4OBAMA@michellemalkin@ProLifeStuff How is a person's health decision "up to" those two pharmacists?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@michellemalkin@DavidHogberg@ProLifeStuff consciences!! Laughable!! Can u say Oxycotin? Vicadon? How many die from prescript addiction? -
@alinamercedes@michellemalkin@ProLifeStuff What is your point, exactly? -
@DavidHogberg of all the deadly, addicting drugs pharms. Sell, y pick on only one pill? Y sell any drug against morals? Not profitable? -
@alinamercedes Why are so willing to tolerate an egregious violation of freedom of religion over just one pill? -
@DavidHogberg no the mass pop would not tolerate pharm. who pik n choose pills if it affected the ENTIRE population
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.