Hi Michael, but isn’t the use of violence the dividing line that we can all agree on here? It’s not that nuanced! If it’s just healthy activism and a genuine attempt to support society’s most vulnerable, why is there a need for snark (even if you disagree with their goals)?
-
-
-
Snark is funny tho
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Same people who label everyone right of Stalin a white supremacist fascist Nazi (and call for punching Nazis, and indeed can't bring themselves to unequivocally condemn violence against an obvious non-Nazi like Andy Ngo) just can't countenance a mild term of mockery like "SJW"
-
The cognitive dissonance is staggering.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
the devil is in the detail Zero people have said you have to be tolerant of all opinions. Tolerance is a short hand (the detail) for acceptance of certain classes of minorities and abilities who have been historically discriminated against. It does not mean tolerate bigots
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Micheal how much do you the proud boys?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Much more of this, please.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How much do you know about the proud boy? Have you talked to anyone of them? Have you read any documention writing by them expressing their believes and feelings?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.