Out of the 7 variables he listed, only one might be construed as right wing. So he's liberal on 6/7 of the top issues and you're saying he's too right wing for you.pic.twitter.com/Vzhsi2IlPC
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You're right. Conservatives are better at towing the line. They're certainly willing to goose step us right back into the past.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Speech policing and shilling for dubious implicit bias research apparently qualifies as long as you can minimize someone being beaten
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perhaps the original point wasn’t that Shermer’s not a liberal, but that Hitler and the Nazis weren’t liberal. Whether Shermer is a liberal isn’t relevant to whether the Nazis were.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not patronizing crypto fascist shills on Quillette would go a long way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, that is the question. If one's stance on the non-enforcement of immigration laws, a return to compulsory busing for school integration, free college, and medicare for all offsets all other liberal positions, how can Dems put together a winning coalition in 2020?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Liberal yes, but they aren’t looking for liberal, they are looking for leftist who abandons liberalism for the “cause”.
-
Progressive are anti-corruption. Hillary and Obama sold out to the 1%. It's not about liberalism any more, it's about honesty and fairness. Shermer, Pinker and Harris are elitists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.