Incorrect
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Do you address his atheist bashing? His "everyone's religious" idiocy? How about the fact that no skeptic could hold any of his unsubstantiated beliefs on Jung, metaphors, or God? Do you address his misogynist social conservatism? Does he have any ideas that withstand skepticism?
-
Can you explain how this is different than dedicating an issue to William Lane Craig or Gwyneth Paltrow? Are you just riding his popularity?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But not all the blatant sexism, misogyny, climate science denial and misrepresentation of canadian law. The stuff that made him popular. His poor misrepresentation of evolutionary biology etc
End of conversation
-
-
-
You realize you just devalued the reputation of the magazine, right? You've dedicated an entire issue to a transphobic self-help guru. If I read it, do I get a free bumper sticker?pic.twitter.com/blMYyQu9Hm
-
Transphobic? Oh dear...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Forgive me, but this David Gorski Character writes like a cocky teenager. I’m going to take a guess: low status lobster?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Everyone likes to eviscerate, I’ll believe it when I read it. It’s not like it hasn’t been debated for a really long time, I’d have thought Godel would have tempered the expectations that you can prove truth in a scientific way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
