Change isn't inherently bad bc it's driven by humans. It's bad if the result kills tons of people and knocks out ecosystems like dominos.
-
-
-
agreed. but the logic is always there that since we caused it that's how we "know" it's bad. that is a fallacy
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
These are the real questions that are never addressed by the alarmists. It all stems from an anti-human worship of nature.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My god some of these responses are beyond "low information"-wtf is wrong with less pollution? Oceans filled with garbage, lakes disappearing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Answers: Eh. And, most likely. Polar bears and French wine = good. Killer storms + floods and ocean mass extinctions = bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Plus I'd rather not find out what our world will look like with a salty pond of a dead ocean. Just my personal thought. (Your welcome.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually climate change is completely normal. It's the acceleration they blame on man. Climate swung 15 degrees 12k years ago. Not man made
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes and yes. It’s won’t destroy every ecosystem irreversibly, but it will cause mass desertification & untold damage to coastal cities
-
Also, the ocean absorbs about 30% of CO2, this acidifies oceans and puts stressea all ocean life, esp. reefs. Great barrier reef is dying
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.