The fact that Heller was a case at all, and was decided 5-4, and that despite this it remains virtually impossible to get guns in many major cities demonstrated the absurdity of thinking that the Constitution protects rights twitter.com/Handsom4452509
Conversation
Replying to
It protects rights by outlining a system that protects them, it cannot do so just by merely stating them. The fact you have that to some extent is already more than most countries have.
Replying to
The Court ahistorically limited #2A in Heller and (all except Thomas, J.) walked right past #14A Privileges or Immunities Clause / Slaughter-House Cases in McDonald. Also unacceptable is that the Court let lower courts ignore Heller for over a decade. scholar.google.com/scholar_case?c
1
9
51
Replying to
Three members of SCOTUS recently dissented on the decision striking down eviction moratoriums.
2
Show more replies