Conversation

The American legal system is heavily based on ignoring and perverting the plain text of Constitutional language

Quote Tweet

Sep 26, 2021

Replying to @AustinGWalters @AgentCo09259883 and 2 others

I love how you both are like "learn to read" as if the American legal system hasn't been arguing about the meaning of these words for 200 fucking years

2:56 PM · Sep 26, 2021

Ian Birnbaum is in The Hague

@ianbirnbaum

Sep 26, 2021

Replying to

@michaelmalice

This is true, actually

Replying to

Replying to

Those that want to disarm the populace are not concerned about what a piece of paper says.

Aloysius In The Morning

Replying to

Replying to

Hence the term "legalese", the language used by the courts. A language with definitions at variance with the common parlance. Case in point: person. In legalese it is a business entity, in common parlance it is a human being.

Replying to

and

IOW, the legal system is “perverted” if it doesn’t agree with my interpretation of the Constitution. Otherwise, it’s ok. I think this was my view when I was 9 or 10 and knew nothing of US history or the law.

Law Office of Jonathan Vernon

@JVernonLaw

Sep 26, 2021

Replying to

@michaelmalice

And statutes. Don't forget to ignore the statutes. Or what older caselaw actually said.

Replying to

I don't trust anyone who pretends the intent and meaning of 2A is some big mystery. The language is plain and the founders expressed their reasoning often.

Show more replies