do you think the NY Times trying to cancel Mt Rushmore is more of a sign of the Times' strength or of its weakness? (if you dont like how this question is phrased, please ignore the poll)
-
-
Can you explain your rationale?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Ding ding ding.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I said weakness because it’s an intellectually weak move. But it certainly is a sign of its strength as well
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They THINK they're doing it from a position of strength. The riots have emboldened them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have noticed a pattern you always claim the other lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’re giving them too much credit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they were doing it for the right reasons, you might be right. But I think they are doing it for the wrong reasons - hence it is weak.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Journalists now are having their cognitive dissonance picked at so to say that they allow themselves to think they are desperate is foolish, to them this move is a reaction to being defied which to them plays as a necessary show of strength but is really ear covered “lalala” weak
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
deimatic behaviour when cornered and threatened
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.