"Yes but you can still call the government as a last resort!" Macys and every other store, and customers, would have access to arbiters between that would not require lawyers, whose job it would be to settle disputes fairly, cheaply and quickly.
-
-
Show this thread
-
The different arbitration firms would not need some master firm over them with a monopoly. Car insurance companies handle this every day without threat of warfare.
Show this thread -
At a certain point, one may argue, the arbitration firms would go to war. That is, in fact, also already the status quo. What are presented as the strongest arguments against anarchism, are inevitably a description of the current system.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How eBay handles disputes between parties is another good example.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A liberty society would require a liberty culture espousing an ethos of liberty that would shepherd, husband and promote a peaceful and free society, where a private system of conflict settlement would be seen as the natural state of being.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, but very limited. You voluntarily enter into that transaction and the implied agreements/policies. Things seem more difficult when the interaction isn't voluntary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In ancapistan customer service disputes would be settled by an independent private contractor that would be selected on merit by the invisible hand of the market
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.