which is more likely: that a Nobel winner doesn't understand those things or a Nobel winner understands them perfectly but is speaking otherwise for his audience ?https://twitter.com/ChrisLoesch/status/1244345950241533954 …
-
-
thank you in advance to the midwits pointing out that Economics is not
#ackshully a Nobel prize you are really doing your part and should not be set on fireShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He wasn’t smart enough to use a VPN.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's probably hard for someone accept that someone that represents so many institutional pillars (MIT/Princeton/NYT/Nobel) can be a malignant force. It's like telling a citizen of Whoville that Santa and his helpers are bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I remember when we thought he was smart and Hillary was a leader. Wow! Was America wrong or what?! Sheesh!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s a terrifying truth to grapple with, especially if you yourself are not “smart”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Krugman is smart enough to know what side of the bread the butter is on. Nobel prizes no longer mean what they once did. They are participation trophies as are so many of the awards the elite give each other. It's really disgusting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I always hate the “intelligence” argument. No matter which side produces it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nobel Prizes are subject-specific; it's possible, even common, for laureates to be narrowly smart, but not generally smart. Krugman, in particular, seems to be the poster boy for the particular brand of intellectualism best described as "smelling one's own farts."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At one point I don’t doubt
@paulkrugman was incredibly smart and that probably what contributed to how he became so dumbThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So... Krugman is an evil sub-genius?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.