Well, that is the definition of traditional conservatism; not to never change but to change more slowly and thoughtfully.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I'm fairly sure his position is just pro-nuclear and capture. Not really equivalent at any speed to people that want to practically tank the economy. I don't think starting to convert to nuclear is crazy.
-
“Not really equivalent at any speed to people that want to practically tank the economy.” Just wait.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Puh-lease. If I wanted real conservative commentary I wouldn’t go to National Review. I’d go to church.

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, R's need to take ownership of the issue. Moreover, we need an energy policy. And we sure as heck don't need another department in DC. State support of "carbon recapture" is not the answer any more than state support of solar was for Obama. Nuclear needs a clearer path.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I cannot support any climate change legislation that doesn't include funding for a space elevator
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
PURGE THE NEOCONS!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
None of it matters. Mount Merapi just erupted. We’re all gonna die very very soon. The mountain certainly is not conservative or didn’t get the memo.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.