This was a choice? I mean it's like giving a choice between Solomon and Hitler and asking which one of these people was more likely to have eaten waffles? Only one possible answer.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i choose uno, because you said “who.” But only by a slight margin. Newspapers have margins, but Donald’s are more of a presidential width.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m non binary:0
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would you agree that the Times could still be convinced of their own virtue while intentionally misleading readers? This is objectively not virtuous according to conventional moral standards. Maybe they convince themselves by setting new moral standards?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nyt solely because I feel trump may not consider himself virtuous necessarily no matter how great he thinks he is. The times considers itself to be a subsidiary of the vatican news. Only more important since they have already confirmed god isn't real.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
B) because I think Trump, while certainly egotistical, is at least somewhat self-aware.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually you could put any lib in for B and they should win
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
100% = 100%
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about choice iii) ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.