It was also written when these exact things didn't exist. There's no such thing as a right to murder as many people as efficiently as possible. Also. They are amendments, meaning they are subject to change.
-
-
-
These are the Bill of Rights. Rights the Founders believed to be God granted. Rights that good government RECOGNIZES does NOT grant. It seems to me the 1st logical step is to punish the few that use GUNS while committing crimes. Longer/ stronger penalties w/
chance of < time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don't tell me what I need
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is a Right for precisely if/when the Need arises.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one needs more than 640k
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ownership of assault weapons helps obviate the need for said weapons. If we didn't have them we'd need them desperately. The fact that we have them helps prevent us all from needing them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You have to admire the god like abilities this anti gun owner person has. He knows everyone's needs. Suggested new law: before anyone can acquire anything, they must seek approval from
@SixPieceTaye who will use his godlike power to divine whether other people have a need.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well said.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tbf if I could legally own an assault rifle I probably would.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.