Nothing says class like preemptively dismissing other people's sexual preferences as unhealthy and immoral. https://twitter.com/McAllisterDen/status/1066710360558903296 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @michaelmalice
What does Malice think of bestiality? Pedophilia? Who wants to bet that he doesn't substantively answer this question, for fear of exposing rank hypocrisy or his own deviancy?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Nihilophant @michaelmalice
Voluntarism addresses human interaction, and does not quantify an 'of age' limitation. There is also no moral definition within it, of which I'm aware, at least, for bestiality. Must you answer for him, or does he not have the courage of his convictions to answer for himself?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeStefan66 @michaelmalice
I wont speak for malice. I'll say that I, as a voluntaryist, recognize the general consensus that children are not capable of consent, therefor, I'm opposed to it, on the grounds that voluntaryism is the philosophy that all interaction should be voluntary (i.e. consensual).
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Ty, i appreciate the clarification
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.