Oh that is absolute nonsense. We are now in an age of media where magazine covers are not meant to be factual. That's got to be news to Time, who would absolutely tell you they are not a tabloid that just makes it up as they go along.https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/status/1010309220087074816 …
-
-
Replying to @NumbersMuncher
by your logic this is deceptive toopic.twitter.com/pJWgTqGLT0
24 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @michaelmalice @NumbersMuncher
No, the article was about the family separation policy, and the photo used was not an example of a little girl being separated from her family. They screwed up.
2 replies 1 retweet 25 likes -
I'm with Michael on this. We're tweeting about the cover now so... either way they win. Selling magazines is all they care about. We could argue they could do that better. Judging by the FoxNews ratings if they became Conservative focused they'd sell more.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I agree that all they care about is exposure and $$ - my point is that we should want both sides to be more factual. That actually proves my point that they misrepresented the issue for the viral impact.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
My understanding was that they mistakenly though it WAS an example of family separation when they published the cover.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
the cover is the least of their deception
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.