It's VERY uncool and inappropriate to use a President's child this way. Adult children, particularly adults working for Trump (Don Jr., Eric, Ivanka, etc.) are fair game, but leave Barron out of it.https://twitter.com/jonathanchait/status/1072118142737022976 …
-
-
Replying to @gorskon
That, and it’s just not a good joke. It’s an easy, cheap shot, and not particularly well executed.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MichaelKuhl
David Gorski, MD, PhD Retweeted Arthur Allen
What amazes me is how elsewhere people are taking me to task for calling this out, including someone I wouldn't have predicted. He even called me sanctimonious.https://twitter.com/arthurallen202/status/1072244003322642432 …
David Gorski, MD, PhD added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Here’s a way to test that. Remove Barron from the joke. Replace his name with the name of any other child. Does it still have the same perceived effect? No. Barron is integral to the joke, because he is the child of the intended target. Without him it doesn’t exist.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.