Michael Kreil

@MichaelKreil

handgemachter Cyber aus rohen Daten

Berlin
michael-kreil.de
Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2009.
505 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @MichaelKreil

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @MichaelKreil

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    27. sij

    "Social bots have influenced elections." Does it sound plausible? Yes. Is it scientifically founded? Not at all. Many mistakes were made in the research and a lack of review allowed an unfounded theory to spread around the world: 1/11

    10 replies 215 proslijeđenih tweetova 370 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Mal was schönes aufn Sonntag: die Ächtung der AfD funktioniert! Schreibt auf Jetzt bloß nicht nachgeben! Weitermachen und und alle die anderen supporten, die die Punches kassieren.

    12 replies 261 proslijeđeni tweet 827 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. 2. velj

    2020-02-02

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. 31. sij

    Ciao, au revoir und machts gut.

    5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. 27. sij

    It is important to look for explanations for the main political events of the last years. And we should keep doing so. But the research needs to be accurate, reviewed, and reproducible. The theory isn't. I call !

    5 replies 6 proslijeđenih tweetova 45 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 27. sij

    Academic research teams, review the papers. Journalists and lawmakers, don't base your reporting and laws on wrong research claims. Do you have more info? Get in touch!

    7 proslijeđenih tweetova 38 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 27. sij

    We need to ask ourselves why we pass new laws based on unreviewed research published by a few scientists, and what that means for our democracy.

    1 reply 8 proslijeđenih tweetova 39 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 27. sij

    We need to ask ourselves why journalists base their reporting on studies whose results contradict each other, and don't even question if these theories produce accurate results. How do you explain that the tool you reported on classifies 1/2 of the US congress as ?

    1 reply 9 proslijeđenih tweetova 48 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 27. sij

    We need to ask ourselves how the totally unfunded theory spread so widely. And more generally, we need to ask ourselves how and why academic research teams spread wrong theories based on scientifically flawed clickbait research.

    12 proslijeđenih tweetova 48 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 27. sij

    The Berkeley/Swansea team claims that during the 2016 US elections, shifted the results by 3.23% towards Trump, based on a correlation between the amounts of tweets using various political hashtags & vote results. What they forgot: Correlation doesn’t mean causality!

    7 proslijeđenih tweetova 36 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 27. sij

    The South California/Indiana is based on a training data that doesn't contain , but "content polluters" aka "spammers" & "malware disseminators". Their method misclassified 12% of Nobel Laureates as bots and 60.7% of the Botwiki bots as humans.

    1 reply 7 proslijeđenih tweetova 42 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 27. sij

    The Computational Propaganda Project of the Oxford Internet Institute is the most widely used source of the claim " manipulate voter opinion". The basis for their study? 50 tweets/day = highly automated Humans like post more than 50 tweets/day.

    7 proslijeđenih tweetova 47 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 27. sij

    8 Nobel laureates, 79 journalists, half of the US Congress, and are bots: It is time to debunk the flawed research.

    12 proslijeđenih tweetova 52 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 27. sij

    Over the last years I have been researching the widespread theories about social bots, scraped over a million Twitter accounts, and reproduced the main studies of the topic. None was able to withstand basic scientific verification.

    1 reply 6 proslijeđenih tweetova 39 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Laut Recherchen des war der mutmaßliche -Mörder in der aktiv via

    9 replies 66 proslijeđenih tweetova 81 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. sij

    Ein junger Mann bewirbt sich bei einem renommierten Architekturbüro in . Die Chefin des Büros kommentiert die Bewerbung wie folgt: „Bitte keine Araber.“ Die E-Mail landet ausversehen beim Bewerber und er wendet sich damit auf FB an die Öffentlichkeit.

    420 replies 2.377 proslijeđenih tweetova 7.935 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. sij

    Das Jahr ist zwar ar noch jung, aber das ist der bisher wichtigste Text:

    426 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.193 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. sij

    Lieber : Sie haben in unserer Diskussion bezweifelt, dass die oberen 30% seit 1998 steuerlich entlastet & die unteren 70% stärker belastet wurden — hier ist der Beleg. Ist es dann nicht sinnvoller mittlere und geringe Einkommen zu entlasten, als Spitzenverdiener?

    55 replies 558 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.508 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. sij

    Wer ernsthaft zitiert als Prof. darf sich nicht wundern, wenn es einen Shitstorm hagelt. Dass das das dann noch ungeprüft zulässt, kann man nicht mehr seriös kommentieren!

    1/2 Jeder vierte ... Diese Prozentzahl beruht auf einer In-house-Recherche der Kommunikationsabteilung, bei der aufgrund eines menschlichen Fehlers die dieser Zahl zugrunde liegenden Analysen (botswatch) nicht ausreichend geprüft... 1/2
    Prikaži ovu nit
    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 24 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. sij

    Three years ago, I quit W3C because DRM violated the sacred covenant that W3C with users - not just Google and Netflix. Now, not only we are seeing tons of programmers quitting for ethical reasons - AND proof we did the right thing.

    7 replies 230 proslijeđenih tweetova 357 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@MichaelKreil još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·