Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @michaelhoffman
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @michaelhoffman
-
Prikvačeni tweet
101 Questions with a Bioinformatician: This week the bioinformatician is me! Interview by
@kbradnam.http://www.acgt.me/blog/2014/4/20/101-questions-with-a-bioinformatician-4-michael-hoffman …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
Routine reminder: Do not use journal-based metrics as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Sign DORA: http://ow.ly/XN0c50yctRb pic.twitter.com/05SeIPXyJS
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Recipes for cooking and baking generated by neural networks, and brought to you by
@JanelleCShane. https://aiweirdness.com/post/190569291992/ai-recipes-are-bad-and-a-proposal-for-making-them …pic.twitter.com/JzBvSpGkus
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
As someone who grew up in the Kansas City area, let me say this: If the Chiefs can win the Super Bowl, you can finish your dissertation.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Last chance! Applications and ref letters for the Amgen Scholars Canada
@ASP_GPO summer undergrad research program@UofTGLSE are due 11:59p ET TONIGHT. Hope to see you in Toronto.https://www.glse.utoronto.ca/amgen-scholars-canada-program/apply …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
It still just blows me away every time I re-read this Kathleen Parker column from November 4, 2016pic.twitter.com/FupEzIYy6M
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
19/Topics in
#TeX and#LaTeX: selected packages, programming, and@overleaf updates. Includes microtype, siunitx, todonotes, xifthen, ifdraft, regexpatch, \expandafter, and \csname.#HoffmanLabTechTalk by@cobyvinerhttps://www.slideshare.net/hoffmanlab/topics-in-tex-and-latex-selected-packages-programming-and-overleaf-updates …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
Reading up on
#Coronarivus and the two major pieces of advice I would like to pass along are:
Wash your hands
Last year’s seasonal flu killed 34,200 people in the US; get your flu shotPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
Your pre-caucus reminder that the Iowa caucuses are undemocratic in process— disadvantaging folks with disabilities, family care restrictions, or employment — and unrepresentative of America. It has an underserved place of extraordinary influence in our political cycle/psyche.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
Given the high, known rates of irreproducibility from the top tier journals (betatrophin, cardiac stem cells, list goes on) published by leading professors, why worry about open access? It was corrected quickly. Much faster then if it had been Nature, Cell or Science.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
“What’s the mechanism?” can be a really ridiculous question. When a truly novel observation is made, almost by definition, the mechanism is unknown (and what qualifies as a “mechanism”?). Asking scientists to wait YEARS before sharing an exciting observation is irresponsible.pic.twitter.com/54kAjQRXLn
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
I’m seeing tons of ridiculous args on how/why bioRxiv should have more stringent criteria. NO!!! That’s what peer review is for, you clowns!!! Hoffman explains it perfectly below. Btw the comments on BS preprints demonstrates the value of *both* peer review and preprints.https://twitter.com/michaelhoffman/status/1223693989448241162 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je TweetHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
Also, you, the reader, have to think skeptically about every peer-reviewed article that you read.
https://twitter.com/michaelhoffman/status/1223702266206654464 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
I think people fail to understand is that if dubious stuff is shared via preprint & it starts getting any traction, the entire community can jump in, tear it apart and rapidly force a correction. Try that with "published in stone" journal papers reviewed by 3 anon "experts".
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Recipe calls for "2 tbsp extra virgin olive or peanut oil". I would like to change things up, does anyone know where I can get extra virgin peanut oil in Toronto
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Michael Hoffman proslijedio/la je Tweet
For those who are indignant at bioRxiv for the recent coronavirus/HIV preprint. I think bioRxiv worked perfectly and showed how much BETTER it can be then the current peer review system.https://twitter.com/michaelhoffman/status/1223695444674514945 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
End of thread. For context, I am not just a bioRxiv reader and submitter but also one of the volunteer screeners.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Otherwise readers forget the disclaimers and start to depend on posted preprints getting an imagined level scrutiny that does not exist. Obvious errors make it clear that scrutiny isn't there. That you, the reader, have to think skeptically about every preprint you read.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
It is important not only that bioRxiv warn that preprints are not checked for errors but also that readers observe that posted preprints have errors.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Despite these warnings plastered everywhere (including the
one with a big yellow highlight), some ignore the contract and argue that we should be able to depend on bioRxiv to exclude errors that are sufficiently obvious. I say no.pic.twitter.com/TjQ0ht5aBP
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.