First, let's dispel a few wrong beliefs. The first enslaved Africans did not arrive in 1619. They were the just the first to arrive in the English colonies. Nearly a century earlier, in 1526, 600 Europeans founded the colony of San Miguel de Gualdape in what's now Georgetown, SC
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
They brought enslaved Africans along with them too. But those slaves revolted damn near as soon as they arrived. As a native of SC whose family still lives near G-town, I can attest to the fact that Georgetown Nakers are known for the shortage of fucks they're willing to give
Näytä tämä ketju -
That's right the first slave rebellion predates the Mayflower. Still, we must dispel another notion that American slavery was like British Slavery. Not quite. America's race-based slavery was different.
Näytä tämä ketju -
First of all, Great Britain never codified slavery into its laws. While it was never illegal, it was never ensconced onto the Constitution like the "land of the free and the home of the brave." Secondly, the British slave trade wasn't exclusively race-based like America's
Näytä tämä ketju -
The British had enslaved people of every color, including buying slaves from the Barbary pirates, who enslaved people from Europe, the Middle East, Northern Africa and even Asia. When the 20 & Odd Negroes arrived in America, there WERE some indentured servants already here.
Näytä tämä ketju -
But the TWICE-stolen Africans, who came here couldn't read, write or speak the language. So, instead of treating them like indentured servants who were providing free labor, these white Virginians changed the game. The African's didn't get contractual periods of servitude.
Näytä tämä ketju -
These new brand of white people were like: "Freedom? Oh, we don't do that over here." Then in 1640, an enslaved African ran away, along with 2 European indentured servants. A Virginia court sentenced them to 30 lashes and extended the white dudes' period of servitude by 1 year
Näytä tämä ketju -
But the black guy got a different sentence: "...and that the third being a negro named John Punch shall serve his said master or his assigns for the time of his natural Life here or elsewhere." Remember, there were STILL more indentured white servants than enslaved blacks
Näytä tämä ketju -
In 1642 it got WORSE, not better, when the Virginia legislature declared that the children of enslaved black women would ALSO be enslaved. Then, those SC negroes made it even worse In 1739, a group of enslaved Kongol soldiers formed their own army and started marching.
Näytä tämä ketju -
As they marched, other enslaved Africans joined in. Led by a literate black man named Jemmy, they burned six plantations and killed two dozen white people. The Stono Rebellion scared so many white South Carolinians, they passed the Negro Act of 1740
Näytä tämä ketju -
It forbade slaves from gathering in one place, growing food and learning how to read. States across the South began passing similar laws. While outlawing reading and writing was significant, these laws had another provision.
Näytä tämä ketju -
They required communities to patrol for runaway slaves. SC had already created one of the nation's first in the first slave patrols in 1704. But this time, they made it mandatory. In 1757, Georgia followed suit. In 1792, Ga even prohibited slaves from even worshiping GOD.
Näytä tämä ketju -
Thes slave patrol rolls were the base of the state militias that fought in the Revolution. After America won the Revolutionary war, I'm sure slavery got better, right? As one well-known state senator from the great state of Maryland once said: "Sheeeeeit."
Näytä tämä ketju -
First, the states enshrined slavery into the Constitution. Many people point to the 3/5ths clause and forget about the FIRST restriction that the constitution placed on Congress in Article 1 Section 9 was: "We're gonna keep this slave trade thing going for at least 20 more years"
Näytä tämä ketju -
This might not seem like a long time to you. But when the Constitutiuon was ratified, the average life expectancy in the US was 38 years old. And, if you notice, the Constitution doesn't specifically mention the words "slavery" or "slave"
Näytä tämä ketju -
That's because the founders KNEW it was an evil institution. They KNEW it would eventually end. They just wanted to preserve it FOR THEM. Let's pause for a minute. Whenever we talk about black history and early America, we mention slavery.
Näytä tämä ketju -
Some people will argue that America wasn't a white supremacist country. They'll even argue that slavery was a necessary evil. That should mean free black citizens had all the same rights as regular citizens, right? Hold up. Let me stop laughing.
Näytä tämä ketju -
This is the EXACT history that I'm talking about The first free black people in the US had all the rights and privileges that were afforded everywhere else. There were places allowed black landowners to vote. By the Declaration of Independence, only white landowners could vote
Näytä tämä ketju -
Then the Constitution allowed states to choose, and most states allowed white landowners who owned a certain amount of property, but some, including NY, Penn and NJ allowed free black property owners to vote. Then those states took THAT RIGHT away!
Näytä tämä ketju -
The 1790 Naturalization Act limited citizenship to any "free white person ... of good character" By the time the Civil War rolled around, any white man could vote. SHOW ME WHERE WHITE SUPREMACY EVER DECREASED!
Näytä tämä ketju -
At the end of the Civil War, the 13th Amendment Abolished slavery, the 14th granted black people citizenship and the 15th guaranteed them the right to vote. A LOT of people believe this is when Jim Crow began. Those people are wrong.
Näytä tämä ketju -
After the Civil War, black people freely registered to vote en masse. Voter registration was more than 90 percent in some states, especially in Southern states like Mississippi, where blacks outnumbered whites. Now that slavery wasn't a thing, how could racists control blacks?
Näytä tämä ketju -
Well, they formed terrorist cells and started killing black people. If you're ever read my description of Reconstruction, you know I don't portray the massive black lynchings as separate events. It was an organized race war
Näytä tämä ketju -
Which brings me to one my favorite but lesser-known episodes in Black History,
Näytä tämä ketju -
You must remember that the racist traitors who declared they'd rather own slaves than be American were not yet Americans. One of the provisions of Georgia being readmitted to the union was that former Confederates couldn't vote or hold office. Well, who else was left in Ga?
Näytä tämä ketju -
In 1868, 30 black men were elected to to the Georgia House and another 3 were elected to the state Senate. Rufus Bullock, a white man, was elected Governor You know white people were mad. In fact, they got so mad that a burgeoning terrorist group came down to help: The KKK
Näytä tämä ketju -
(This may or may not be the genesis of the song "Devil Went Down to Georgia.") In 1868, the KKK and white supremacists in Ga removed the Original 33 from office. They literally overthrew the government. And for good measure, they started killing them.
Näytä tämä ketju -
One quarter of the Original 33 were killed, And when black people prostested, the KKK killed them, too. When blacks converged in Camilla, Ga to protest, whites in Mitchell County stationed in hiding places opened fire, killing dozens. That was just a small taste.
Näytä tämä ketju -
In 1868, white terrorists in Georgia murdered so many black people that the entire state was KICKED BACK OUT OF THE UNION. The Ga Supreme Court ruled, in 1869: "...There is no existing law of this State which confers the right upon the colored citizens thereof to hold office"
Näytä tämä ketju -
One of my favorite quotes about this reign of terror is that the Gov. Bullock "was obliged by the Ku Klux Klan to resign his governorship and, in his discerning contemplation felt it wise to leave the state." That's gangsta terrorist shit, right there.
Näytä tämä ketju - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.