You’re probably overthinking this. Liberal lawyers cleverly used a textualist/formalist theory of the case to get a liberal result by appealing to the textualist method of a conservative justice. So he read the text.
-
-
-
Also, from your POV, he left a huge loophole for religious discrimination claims and also mandatory arbitration, which cons love, wipes all of this out.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is why I left Episcopalianism for Calvinism.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I mean, there are 5 Catholic justices. So there are limitations to this explanatory framework.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are 5 Roman Catholic justices on the Supreme Court & you’re going to blame this one on the one guy you can pin the Episcopalian label on?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The 1800s called, they want this guy to come back
-
what’s next, are you anti-disestablishmentarianism? (He probably is tbh).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.