Reading Bill Gates, John Doerr and Andy Grove on OKRs: https://www.gatesnotes.com/Books/Measure-What-Matters?WT.mc_id=20180516172000_MeasureWhatMatters_BG-LI&WT.tsrc=BGLI&linkId=51788990 … It sounds like an interesting approach for many lines of work (e.g., engineering at Intel), but unsuitable for research.
-
Show this thread
-
Are there similarly effective frameworks for managing one's own (or helping others') research?
5 replies 0 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Why do you think OKRs aren't useful for research?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @henryquantum
If you hit your objectives in research, it means things have gone badly.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
More generally, Intel is a company which wants a great deal of control over its process. That means things ought to be predictable. In research the things most worth doing are not predictable.
3:37 PM - 17 May 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.