I may sound a bit naive, but as I read more academic papers in fields that I work in, I realize that they tend to cite academic papers more than blog posts even if there are better blog posts than the cited papers. It makes sense, but just noticing more specifically first hand.
-
-
One comparatively low overhead way to do this—create a peer review process for things that are already out there. No author submissions needed. Curation by editors, with authors getting invited to have their work reviewed. This ends up looking more like an awards program.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It all really comes down to influence. Which works influenced your thinking? It can be a scientific paper, but it can also be an essay or a tweet. If we don't keep track of that, we're missing out on the full picture.
-
The real issue is that researchers need ways of signalling to institutions that they have made important contributions. The traditional journal format is a clunky but effective way of doing this.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah but at the moment, academics don’t really care about non-academics- no incentives for promotion, citations, funding, awards. Sad but true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.