I've been consistently astonished by how many research groups take a "sink or swim" approach to mentorship. A robust research training pipeline would be (at minimum) incredibly lucrative for industry to solve. This approach is the first really great structured method I've seen:https://twitter.com/hqz/status/988097938902614017 …
-
-
Both - Lack of a shared community effort - "we are all here trying to do X, we value this and we are sharing artifacts of progress towards it". The way software agile practices are a shared community effort by developer teams to throw off crappy project management structures.
-
Other examples of problem -> proposed structures: Reproducibility -> preregistration, badges, etc. Conference harassment -> codes of conduct A problem is identified. We collectively agree it's a problem. Structures to address it are developed, shared, and iterated upon.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.