I've been consistently astonished by how many research groups take a "sink or swim" approach to mentorship. A robust research training pipeline would be (at minimum) incredibly lucrative for industry to solve. This approach is the first really great structured method I've seen:https://twitter.com/hqz/status/988097938902614017 …
Very interesting. I'm reading through their model now. Anything in particular that you think is striking?
-
-
This might reveal the depth of my frustration, but what strikes me most is that *this exists at all*. If you start with *any* framework for "how we do things", and it contains a working feedback mechanism to improve the approach itself, you'll end up with a *good* framework.
-
That aside, I also really love that this framework takes it as an unspoken axiom that the skills required to do research are *skills, not fixed traits*, and thus learnable. ex "helpseeking skills and dispositions".
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.