I suspect the answer is zero, but I’d like to be proven wrong. Of course it depends on the definition of “paper”, so let’s say anything indexed by Web of Science or Google Scholar.https://twitter.com/johnkitchin/status/982288371048366081 …
-
-
Replying to @khinsen
written in? There's one with Rob Knight and Fernando Perez that was written in it. But publishers... *shrug* formats prevent.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ctitusbrown @khinsen
Notebooks, dunno. But that's a weirdly constrained format. Things like http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com (600 GS citations), http://distill.pub , http://worrydream.com , "The Nature of Code", SICM, etc all count as publication.
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
for compatibility with publishers, one would have to use something like nbconvert to generate LaTeX for submission. That is what we do with orgmode. http://distill.pub AFAIK is handwritten html and javascript to produce high-end interactive publications.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @johnkitchin @michael_nielsen and
In the last two years, they have published 10 articles? They are beautiful, but serve a different role than your typical scientific article.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Sure. I'm just pointing out that plenty of people have taken things into their own hands in regards to publishing format. Either by starting a journal (like http://distill.pub ), or by self-pub (http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com , http://worrydream.com , http://cognitivemedium.com etc)
3 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @johnkitchin and
I'm obviously rather biased, but I think http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com is an interesting model. I simply ask people to cite it in the page footer, people do, and Scholar notices. No conventional publisher needed.pic.twitter.com/WaFVu22xvA
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
</brag> (Although, in this case, I genuinely think it's really interesting that this worked. I didn't think it would, and didn't check citations for almost two years after publication. I was shocked.)pic.twitter.com/5uV1tRnGHP
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.