"As We May Think" is part of a tiny genre: a grand vision document that's extremely insightful, and which becomes incredibly influential. It's tempting to say prescient, but the essay actually helped create its imagined future.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
"As We May Think" seems to me like the writings of Locke or Montesquieu: a set of ideas that decisively influenced major parts of our cultural operating system. In one case, the US Constitution (& the many others influenced), in the other, the web & computer software more broadly
Prikaži ovu nit -
It's fun to consider "As We May Think" as part of a line of successful grand vision documents: Engelbart on "Augmenting Human Intellect" (https://www.dougengelbart.org/pubs/augment-3906.html … ), Alan Kay on "A Personal Computer for Children of All Ages" (https://mprove.de/diplom/gui/kay72.html … ) ...
Prikaži ovu nit -
... Stallman on free software (the GNU manifesto and the GPL),
@timberners_lee on "Information Management: a Proposal" (https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html …), and perhaps Satoshi on Bitcoin (https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf ) - time will tell.Prikaži ovu nit -
One thing that stands out: managing information overload is a recurring obsession. Bush has his Memex (memory extender), with which he hoped to improve in some ways on the associative operation of the human mind, especially in permanence and clarity:pic.twitter.com/kxidXPXnVh
Prikaži ovu nit -
In particular, Engelbart, Kay, and
@timberners_lee all return to the theme of information overload, in different ways.@timberners_lee's title is "Information Management: A Proposal".Prikaži ovu nit -
Of course, information overload is intrinsically an insoluble problem. Understanding is so valuable that we will always push ourselves to our limits in managing information, no matter how good our tools become, & feel uncomfortable as we push up against them.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Better tools expand the limits of the information we can manage, but do little to change our desire to go still further, because that desire is only very weakly a function of the quantity of information we can currently manage.
Prikaži ovu nit -
I say information overload is "insoluble", but that's a pessimistic way of framing it. A much better way is that it's an open-ended problem: we can always do better. I won't be surprised if many grand vision documents of the future will also focus on that problem.
Prikaži ovu nit -
It's not clear how many of the authors had ambitions to write influential grand vision documents. Mostly, I think, they were obsessed with important fundamental problems whose time was nearly ripe - so obsessed that they stumbled on some very good ideas, which they then developed
Prikaži ovu nit -
More recurring themes: not just information management, but also memory, note-taking, association of ideas, and problem-solving. None of these problems have yet been solved well, IMO.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Satoshi stands out as different, being much more focused on co-ordination problems.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Another striking difference: all the later vision documents eventually led to working systems, and that was a big part of their success (especially the web and Bitcoin). Bush's vision did not. And yet it was hugely influential anyway.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Back to Bush: it's fun to see how many ideas still haven't entirely come to fruition. Here he is on sharing entire lines of thought and investigation, a sort of super-
@pinboard or -@pinterest. Keep in mind, this is 1945:pic.twitter.com/WuOg4NYQcZ
Prikaži ovu nit -
Here's Bush describing so much of the web and wikidom (again: 1945):pic.twitter.com/IWODC7JnPK
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
It's fascinating that he's imagining this all through the lens of analog machines. In fact, Bush never really got into digital computing. It passed him by. But hardware aside, he was thinking about the right problems and at a great level of design abstraction.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Anyways, there's much, much more in the article. Well worth reading!
Prikaži ovu nit -
More fun things: see
@hyfen's project to build a memex: https://hyfen.net/memex/Prikaži ovu nit -
And
@TrevorFSmith's memex: https://trevor.smith.name/memex/Prikaži ovu nit -
Just a small appendix. Reading back over my thread, it's got too much of the "gee-whiz, wasn't that a clever insight of a giant of the past" trope about it.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Yes, Bush was clever. But that's not so interesting. I think it's more interesting to think about the big, broad fundamental questions he was addressing, and how far we are from really solving them.
Prikaži ovu nit -
How to manage information overload? What are the real bottlenecks? How can we make vastly better computer note taking systems? Why haven't we gone beyond the file metaphor? How can we build better personal memory systems? Better collective memory systems? So many great problems!
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.