The @google scholar maximal number of co-authors should not be fixed to 200?. It should be removed for scientists with organically growing publication records at reputable universities. I really want to add @spiralmensh - I am sure I wrote a paper with him.
-
I think if scholar shuts down tomorrow scientific productivity worldwide would drop by 5%. So this should be a big project.
Yeah, it's a very good example of @timoreilly's precept to "create more value than you capture".
