The @google scholar maximal number of co-authors should not be fixed to 200?. It should be removed for scientists with organically growing publication records at reputable universities. I really want to add @spiralmensh - I am sure I wrote a paper with him.
-
-
Replying to @stochastician @KordingLab and
People in high-energy physics may have this problem after their first student paper as an undergrad...
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @stochastician @KordingLab and
Didn't realize there was a "preferred coauthors" list in Scholar(?!) Just a "coauthors" list, which I thought is what he was referring to.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @stochastician @michael_nielsen and
I think they mean all co-authors. At least they suggest I add people. And then deny my choice. And yes, I have awesome collaborators and like to brag about them.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
My understanding is that it was started as a side project, and is still maintained with minimal resources as (to some extent) an act of generosity on Google's part. I don't think it'd take enormous resources for someone else to build - but no-one has.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
YC is tiny compared to Berkeley, much less UC.
-
-
Replying to @stochastician @michael_nielsen and
Meanwhile, in
@Wikidata land: crowdsourced scholarly profiles generated from CC0 linked open data https://tools.wmflabs.org/scholia/author/Q8219 …1 reply 6 retweets 8 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.