The @google scholar maximal number of co-authors should not be fixed to 200?. It should be removed for scientists with organically growing publication records at reputable universities. I really want to add @spiralmensh - I am sure I wrote a paper with him.
-
I think they mean all co-authors. At least they suggest I add people. And then deny my choice. And yes, I have awesome collaborators and like to brag about them.
My understanding is that it was started as a side project, and is still maintained with minimal resources as (to some extent) an act of generosity on Google's part. I don't think it'd take enormous resources for someone else to build - but no-one has.
-
-
I think if scholar shuts down tomorrow scientific productivity worldwide would drop by 5%. So this should be a big project.
-
Yeah, it's a very good example of
@timoreilly's precept to "create more value than you capture".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
YC is tiny compared to Berkeley, much less UC.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, but they are not very complete and their deduplication algorithm is really weak. E.g. i exist several times.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.