Serious Q: Is it *ever* a good idea for the typical person to read current events journalism as it’s published? Is it not just strictly better to wait 6-12 weeks, start w/ the Wikipedia entry, then work back through whichever pieces seem to acknowledge most of the relevant facts?
-
-
The fuller quote has more of the nuance:https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/213539-science-is-the-only-news-when-you-scan-a-news …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Though perhaps non-scientists should *also* avoid consuming science that's less than 12 months old to avoid all of science's problems with e.g. publication bias and statistical misuse, especially if the study's result is unexpected and exciting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.