The nominations so far are captchas and d3. Great projects both. But if those are the _most_ important things academic HCI has produced over the past 20 years, frankly it's not looking good as a field. Other suggestions?https://twitter.com/michael_nielsen/status/963876614286098432 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Do brain-computer interfaces count? If so, neural prosthetics might be up there.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ZenPylon
How much HCI input is there? Everything I've read in the field has been done primarily by neuroscientists, or specialists in the various sensory technologies used. But I'm not deeply read.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @michael_nielsen @ZenPylon
To the extent brain-computer interface work comes to find a home in HCI, it'd count as a success. But right now I'm not sure that's warranted. There is some very interesting stuff about sensors to help the blind see, etc, which HCI had major input into.
1:43 PM - 14 Feb 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.