The nominations so far are captchas and d3. Great projects both. But if those are the _most_ important things academic HCI has produced over the past 20 years, frankly it's not looking good as a field. Other suggestions?https://twitter.com/michael_nielsen/status/963876614286098432 …
How much HCI input is there? Everything I've read in the field has been done primarily by neuroscientists, or specialists in the various sensory technologies used. But I'm not deeply read.
-
-
To the extent brain-computer interface work comes to find a home in HCI, it'd count as a success. But right now I'm not sure that's warranted. There is some very interesting stuff about sensors to help the blind see, etc, which HCI had major input into.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hmm, I'm not sure. I meant more, does a computer interface with a brain count as an interface with a human?
-
As an example, I worked in a lab a few summers ago, and we used an EEG to interpret basic motor imagery tasks ("imagine closing your right hand"). Those interpreted signals were then used to control a robotic arm.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.