Personal Moats for the 21st Century: https://medium.com/@danielgross/your-personal-moats-f5221035338f#---24-281 …pic.twitter.com/cOSUu18Vh2
Your argument against video seems mostly wrong to me. A large fraction of serious writing now has video or audio analogues - usually the author giving talks. In many cases (not all) the video is superior.
-
-
Interesting! I personally find retention is superior when reading as I cannot divert attention *and* consume the content at the same time. Video/audio have too much of a treadmill effect. Per my footnote, I can’t find respectable research backing this up. Yet. Anecdata FTW!
-
I get something out of video/audio that I find much harder in print: you can easily tell how the author feels about their work. This is sometimes the most valuable element - it can be motivating, and often points to interesting opportunities.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Of course, at most this would only slightly modify your point: paying lots of attention to serious video could also be part of a personal moat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reading has considerably higher bitrate than video/audio. Reading also takes more processing power - which is why most ppl don't read well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.