Which problems make good research problems? http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2018/02/which-problems-make-good-research.html?spref=tw …
-
-
Replying to @skdh
Here is a post by
@tobiasosborne (with the appearance of@michael_nielsen) about picking good (normal?) research problems: "The idea is to regard research ideas as investments, i.e. assets, and to evaluate their potential return and their risk." https://tjoresearchnotes.wordpress.com/2014/05/27/the-best-advice-i-ever-got/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The problem with this type of assessment is that the most immediate potential return is approval by the community, not actual scientific value.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You are right, of course, and I am aware of your very good posts about the risks of confusing the two; one hopes that the two are at least somewhat related
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
One can, of course, try to evaluate based on the value of the understanding you hope a project will produce, rather than which journal would publish it in. That's also tricky - it's hard to make such predictions. But better than "Will this go in Nature / PRL / etc?", IMO.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.