I added several hundred Anki cards while doing.
-
-
The early cards were mostly very simple things: facts about TDGammon (which used a similar approach to beat Backgammon), very basic facts about how Go works, and reinforcement learning and Monte Carlo Tree search.
2 replies 1 retweet 43 likesShow this thread -
Later, the facts got more and more complex.
1 reply 2 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
Of course, I didn't master all the literature around the paper. But I think I made pretty rapid progress coming up to speed.
1 reply 1 retweet 24 likesShow this thread -
Now, just to write one article that wouldn't necessarily have been a good use of time. But a nice thing about Anki is that the information is retained. When the AlphaGo Zero and AlphaZero papers came out, they were very easy to read.
1 reply 1 retweet 34 likesShow this thread -
Verb form: I talk and think of "Ankifying" a paper or book etc.
4 replies 6 retweets 68 likesShow this thread -
It's easy to overdo it, especially initially, and waste time Ankifying useless info. Over time, I've found myself cultivating heuristics for how much to Ankify.
2 replies 1 retweet 44 likesShow this thread -
E.g., for many papers the answer is 0 to 5 questions. But for papers I want to understand better it might be 20 to 40. And for deep papers that I want to master it may be hundreds.
5 replies 6 retweets 72 likesShow this thread -
Lots more to say, but I'll leave it there for now.
19 replies 1 retweet 55 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Do you type out more complex Anki cards or just copy paste? I keep stumbling at the point when I spend too long making/refining the cards and not enough time doing the exercise.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.