As it should be for all journals. All. Journals.https://twitter.com/PsychScience/status/953675782429331456 …
-
There is tons of replication in astrophysics. In any case, normalising replication as a key feature within all empirical journals does not logically lead to the conclusion that all empirical results within those journals must be (or can be) replicated.
I wasn't talking about astrophysics, a far broader subject than Big Bang cosmology. In the latter, while analyses can be replicated, and some (but far from all) methods, the underlying experimental event cannot.
-
-
This is also true of certain kinds of fieldwork, where samples may be irreproducible, and consumed. E.g, certain types of air archive, which take air samples for things like longitudinal studies. Once you use the early air up, you can no longer replicate.
-
Certainly, I agree replication is an interesting thing to think about in all sciences. But your original statement was far too strong.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.