This piece has been shared a lot -- to my annoyance, because IMO this journalist badly mischaracterizes the research: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2017/12/20/the-surprising-thing-google-learned-about-its-employees-and-what-it-means-for-todays-students …
-
-
Cherry picking? (Or is that to general for your intentioned use?). Procrustean might also come close.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Gell-Mann Amnesia effect seems relevant in this context.pic.twitter.com/LYEjQo5CuX
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a (half-baked) form of post-hoc data analysis and certainly a reason why that can be frowned on as a research method. Otherwise, "cherry picking" or my preference, "Never let the facts get in the way of a good story"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
confirmation bias
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.