The Copernican revolution wasn't as clear-cut as it seems in hindsight. Great essay argues that it was reasonable to reject heliocentrism at the time:https://www.lesserwrong.com/posts/JAAHjm4iZ2j5Exfo2/the-copernican-revolution-from-the-inside …
-
-
Replying to @RamiroHumSah @SichuLu
The post explicitly says the average person is unlikely to know general covariance. So you're criticising an imaginary post. Please read the post carefully & understand what it says before criticising it. Tim Gowers' very careful comments are a good model.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @RamiroHumSah
I'm not sure who this is directed at, but I didn't assert that average people would know what it is or should. I just thought the implication you drew from it wasn't just wrong for conceptual reasons but also physical ones.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SichuLu @RamiroHumSah
.
@RamiroHumSah wrote: "The note is a very bad joke, it is exaggeratedly pedantic to expect the average person to explain the concept of general covariance by answering such a simple question." Aside from being insulting, it also badly misreads what I very plainly wrote.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
In the post I wrote "Of course, I don't think too many of the survey respondents were arguing on the basis of general covariance". I make similar statements in the comments. So, no, I don't expect average people will know general covariance.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.