I hope no self-respecting members of the ML community consider submitting to the new scammy Nature ML journal. Worth revisiting this piece on how JMLR (the undisputed top journal in ML) is run (and how clowny journal publishers are).https://blogs.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2012/03/06/an-efficient-journal/ …
-
-
Replying to @zacharylipton @hardmaru
The words "scammy" and "Nature" aren't often found together. Is there some background to learn more? (Full disclosure: my wife and I worked for Nature for years, and I think of it as the gold standard of scientific publishing)
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Then, with respect, you've been sleeping during machine learning's transition to a much better model
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Taxes pay for the research, professors & students do the research, the reviewing, the editing -> researchers keep copyright & papers are available for free
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
It'd be significantly better if, for publicly-funded research, the paper and code and (where possible) the data were released under open licences.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.