Do the publications in high-profile journals often come from relative unknowns?
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
I see your point. I think that relative unknowns are much more likely to get good feedback on their work through the formal process.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @oanacarja @michael_nielsen
Will a brilliant paper/idea surface regardless of submission to journal? I think that's very likely...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @oanacarja @michael_nielsen
But finding better ways to democratize feedback might help the not-quite-developed precursor idea to the brilliant idea...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @oanacarja
AFAICT just asking for feedback will often get it. A friend with no (undergrad) degree started sending thoughtful emails to senior
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @oanacarja
people in his area of interest. Pretty soon he was getting feedback, invitations to visit, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @oanacarja
That's n=1 of course. But in general I think people underestimate how successful they can be with thoughtful requests for comment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @oanacarja
There's a related point, of course, which is that most people send really unthoughtful requests for comment. He wrote very careful emails
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @oanacarja
that closely connected his work to things the people he was writing to were working on: it became about them (and him).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
In other words, if you thoughtfully put in the work, people will appreciate that, respond and help. I agree!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Not everyone (he had no-responses from some people, or unhelpful). But a large enough fraction of people that it's worth it!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.