In part, that's because it's a new way of observing the Universe, like the early telescopes or microscopes.
-
-
Show this thread
-
-
In 1998 I went to a talk by Kip Thorne where he said LIGO would likely need a strain sensitivity of "1 part in 10 to the 21" to see anything
Show this thread -
That's an accuracy comparable to measuring the distance to the Sun to an accuracy of one atom.
Show this thread -
At the time I simply laughed, and thought it would take centuries, or never happen.
Show this thread -
Here's the abstract for the Nobel-winning paper. And there, in the second sentence, a "strain of 10^-21", bang on the money.pic.twitter.com/oej6Anewmw
Show this thread -
Frankly, it's just utterly, utterly mindboggling that (a) we could predict gravitational waves; that
Show this thread -
(b) people like Joseph Weber and Rai Weiss could even conceive of measuring them; and
Show this thread -
(c) that people like Weiss, Thorne, Barish, Drever and their many, many collaborators could actually carry it out.
Show this thread -
Oh, and (d) that they persisted over half a century!
Show this thread -
So, hat's off to all of them, & congrats on an utterly remarkable achievement, one giving us a new window onto the Universe.
Show this thread -
Oh - and here's looking forward to the next 50 years, as we improve the sensitivity of detection, and make many major discoveries!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.