1) I've always been annoyed by "intellectual trolls," people who optimize for saying interesting things without caring about truth.
-
-
Replying to @juliagalef
There's a related (but v. diff) thing, which is people who playfully explore in interesting ways. 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @juliagalef
But in some spheres of discussion that's frowned upon in many circles. I sometimes wonder if the i. trolls are a response. 2/
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Do the explorer types get backlash even if they're honest about the fact that they're just in exploration-mode? If so that seems unfair.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @juliagalef
I'm just thinking that exploration of socially sensitive things is often fraught. Eg your recent request for hypotheses about gender/tech.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @juliagalef
By contrast, it's a lot less fraught to say "Hey, here's a really crazy idea about P vs. NP" and go to town...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Oh, I predict I'd have gotten a lot MORE backlash if I seemed to take a position on gender & tech, rather than just floating hypotheses :)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
I totally agree! You couched it in v. hypothetical & abstract terms, & still people complained. Much easier to explore in many subjects!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.