Hard to make work in fields with deeper knowledge. Difficult to meet outsider critiques of general relativity this way. cc @Noahpinion
. @Noahpinion with a nice criterion for insider critiques of outsider commentary: http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.com/2017/05/vast-literatures-as-mud-moats.html …pic.twitter.com/qlOFxvNaV7
-
-
-
Or just about any branch of mathematics. If I come across math paper on arxiv readable by wide audience I often post here as it's so unusual
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but what happens if those two papers are great? do you then have to negotiate the "not very muddy" moat?
-
Yes, if you're serious.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Brilliant, fair, original. You win.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure, and if I read 2 papers on number theory I wouldn't get em either. But I'd be able to see *why* I needed more knowledge!!
-
Reading some papers, I think: "Wow, I don't understand how this was done. I need to understand this before I bloviate about it."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Note that this is a card carrying Musk fan boy. Everything he says is suspect. He should read two articles on Tesla first.
-
Here's a place to start:https://seekingalpha.com/article/4062953-big-tesla-swindle …
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
woa, is that what intellectual worry? I say, just chill your life a little and read what you want. you have so much time to spent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.